Paris
Fifth Avenue World's Third Most Expensive Residential Street
With apartments fetching an average price of $7,500 per square foot, Fifth Avenue ranked third place in a new survey of the top 10 most expensive residential streets in the world from Barclay’s Wealth Bulletin. But if you thought top-tier residential prices in Manhattan were stratospheric, take a look at the two most expensive streets on the survey.
Avenue Princess Grace in Monaco ranked No. 1 in the survey with homes fetching an average of $17,750 a foot.
“Properties on the avenue change hands for up to $41 million – and many of them are fairly modest four-bedroom apartments,” the report said. read more »
Mon Dieu! Americans Behind Europe Record-Breaker
Naturally, it's a bunch of burly American I-bankers who made the biggest single-asset deal in European history.
Lehman Brothers has purchased Coeur Defense, a series of five buildings, from Goldman Sachs for 2.11 billion euros, or $2.8 billion U.S. dollars. It's a record for the overseas bunch.
Cushman & Wakefield, which also advised the biggest single-building sale ever in U.S. history at 666 Fifth Avenue for $1.8 billion, advised Lehman Brothers in this deal. read more »
Full release after the jump.
- John KoblinCucina de Balthazar
The Transom
The Transom
The Afternoon Wrap: Wednesday
- In the ongoing quest to find the city's scariest bar, the NY Press heads to the Navy Yard Cocktail Lounge, where ice-less $3 cocktails and Tupperware Cheez Doodles are a reminder of what Brooklyn was like before Hollywood came. [NYP]
- Who knew Canadian real estate had become so exceedingly ritzy? In Ontario, for example, a "legacy home" on the market for $45 million comes with 14 acres--not to mention a baseball diamond and private pebble beach. [Forbes]
- But the real French speakers have the real real estate prices: The average price per square foot of Paris' apartments is around $2,250*. (In other news: France says "non!" to non-chic megastores.) [Matrix] *UPDATE: Our math was corrected (we kid you not) in an email from a former Goldman Sachs executive director: "Please note that 1 square meter = 10.76 square feet. Based on the correct conversion ratio, prices per square foot in Paris seem to be in line with New York." Is that true? Can any Francophile mathematicians set us straight?
- Rendering of the Week: Frank Gehry's plan for the future United Arab Emirate Guggenheim is not your mother's Upper East Side museum. Does the photo above look like haute, techy, post-post-modern glory--or a pile of rubble? [Dezeen] - Max Abelson
Cozy Chelsea Hangout Boasts Intrepid, Jet-Set Bill of Fare
Hoppin’ Down The Bunny Trail
Times Staffers' Guidelines for Travel Site: "The worst steak in Gstaad" is Not Appropriate
Righ now, readers--and Times reporters--can comment on London, Paris and Los Angeles. read more »
After the jump is the full memo with guidelines, such as no anonymous posting in the comments section. Take that "sprezzatura!"
Happy Feet Taps into Joy; Stirrings at City Ballet
The New Yorker Uses the G-Word
That said, I question the casual use, twice, of the word "goyim," without ital, without quotation marks, to refer to non-Jews. In a piece that shows some sensitivity on the issue of Christians' misunderstanding of Jews (they say we're not forgiving, and that's antisemitic), the use of "goyim" evinces a lack of understanding by Jews of their own situation. The word means "the nation," the gentile world, and has a dash of Boratish wariness and hostility. It is Yiddish, and is not like shlep or chutzpah, that is, an assimilated neutral word. It's a signal to other Jews, Let's talk as landsmen. I think it's arrogant and exclusionary. Jews have large cultural power in America; acting as if we're still some persecuted subgroup is way way beneath us. I gather from one gentile friend that he has friends who feel themselves to be outside the cultural establishment and have appropriated the word "goyim" to refer to themselves, in something of the proud/resentful way that blacks took on the n-word. I know, the cultural valences aren't the same. But it's loadedwhy make half your audience feel excluded?
[I note that Wikipedia agrees with me here...]
Who's Le Plus Chaud? French Emo-Memoirist Grégoire Bouillier
Who’s Le Plus Chaud? French Emo-Memoirist Grégoire Bouillier
Long Live Mary of Tribeca
Long Live Mary of Tribeca
Swiss Masquerading as Turk, Victim of His Own Expertise
Swiss Masquerading as Turk, Victim of His Own Expertise
MoMA Deifies Dada’s Top Dog, But Husband, Wife Steal Show
What Materazzi Said to Zidane: Newspapers All Over the World Weigh In
"I certainly didn't call him a terrorist," he added. "I am ignorant. I don't even know what an Islamic terrorist is; my only terrorist is her," he said, pointing to his 10-month-old daughter, who was sleeping next to him on the plane that took the Italian team back to Italy.
The best story is from the Guardian, which does not hold back on its language in reporting:
Materazzi has not elaborated on what he did say, but one report suggested he responded [to Zidan'es challenge to take his shirt later] with: "I'd rather take the shirt off your wife." He has, however, denied that he insulted Zidane's mother or called the son of Algerian immigrants a terrorist. A lip reader employed by the BBC claimed Materazzi said: "I wish an ugly death to you and all your family," and then told Zidane to "go fuck yourself". Paris-based anti-racism group, SOS-Racism, had earlier said that "several very well informed sources" suggested Zidane was called a "dirty terrorist". "I did not call him a terrorist," responded the Italian World Cup winner. "I am not a cultured person and I don't even know what an Islamist terrorist is. For me the mother is sacred, you know that."Journalists should take a cue from the Guardian and not censor themselves. The story deserves linguistic candor. (C.f., Earl Butz, Agriculture Secretary under Nixon, who lost his job for a racist joke that none of the MSM would repeat in full...)
MoMA Names Architecture and Design Chief
This morning, the MoMA sent out a release announcing the move. Full release is after the jump. read more »
Tuesday: Billy Joel in Brooklyn, Zaha Hadid on NY
- Zaha Hadid plays nice, pleasantly conversing about the future of architecture. Eventually she cracks and says things like: Paris is "beautiful, but it has no energy." At the grand finale she somehow acknowledges the possibility of seeing her work in twenty years and gasping: "Oh, my goodness, this is really irritating." (New York Magazine)
- The FBI informs us that New York City's crime rate fell while the nation's numbers rose. But prospective New Yorkers beware: our robbery stats don't look so good--plus, we turn out to be the second-least generous folks in the country. (AP, via Crane's)
- New York lawmakers try their very best to get generous: a $1 billion property tax relief plan is passed, although it happens to be similar to the one "scuttled" by George "Prez" Pataki earlier this year. (The New York Times)
- Listen to William Zeckendorf talk about his billion dollar baby: 15 Central Park West. And there's more: he even chats about the overall NY condo market. (The Real Deal Podcast)
- Billy Joel and his eighteenth wife visit the Brooklyn Heights townhouse that first went on the market for a borough record-setting $20 million. Luckily the price has since fallen to $16 and then $12.9 million. ("We are not coming down from here," swears Corcoran broker Deanna Kory.) (New York Daily News)
- Over at the Freedom Tower construction site, so far things are going just perfectly (seismologically speaking). (The New York Times) - Max Abelson
A Stylish Contradiction: Furst's Romantic Realism
A Stylish Contradiction: Furst’s Romantic Realism
Carrère’s La Moustache: Are We Really Alone?
Carrère's La Moustache: Are We Really Alone?
Brokeback Sopranos
The borrowing's fine. But it's symptomatic of a problem with The Sopranos. The writers and producers are straining at the form. It's not enough to have a Jersey Mafia story anymore, they have to have shafts of otherworldly literary light pouring in from out of nowhere at every turn. I mean the Lorraine Bracco shrinkabruptly, finallychallenging Tony about the violence in his job. "We've been dancing around how you live for years." Sugar, why now? And ethically, are you allowed to bring up stuff the analysand doesn't? I found it intrusive. Then there were Carmela's art-inspired epiphanies about the brevity of life in Paris. Parison the Sopranos. They should leave that stuff to Merchant and Ivory, and just let the Sopranos be the Sopranos.
Inside Man's Not So Lousy; Plus: Spike and Me on TV
Inside Man’s Not So Lousy; Plus: Spike and Me on TV
First Warning: The Conception of Lizzie
We're assured there is no news just yet, but we're "expecting" to hear an announcement from Lizzie Grubman and new hubby Chris Stern after they return from their Paris honeymoon this weekend.
MoMA, Guggenheim Sunk in Hong Kong

The Foster design.
The decision is a setback for several major museums. The Georges Pompidou Center in Paris and the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation and the Museum of Modern Art in New York had been vying for the right to run museums at the cultural center, which was to be several times the size of Lincoln Center.The proximate cause was the pull-out of local real-estate interests from the project, which is why officials are saying the project just needs to be tweaked out a bit to get back on track. But the Times cites longstanding objections to the project by Hong Kong artists, who felt too much control was being ceded to foreign arts institutions, and the public, which saw the project as a developers' boondoggle.
Tom Krens, whom we like to think of as a sort-of 21st Century Fitzcarraldo, had called the project "the most exciting opportunity in the world because of the scale and the location."
Sorry, guys.
Meanwhile, the Asia Society's frontman, former U.N. ambassador Richard Holbrooke, is having more luck: tomorrow, Robin Pogrebin reports, he'll announce plans to build a $52 million satellite in Hong Kong, at a Waldorf gala for the society. The designers are Tod Williams and Billie Tsien. read more »
- Tom McGeveranAnthill Dies of Bee Stings

The new Javits Center.
It's not that the plan isn't great; it's just that, like the original (which might have resembled the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris but ... didn't), politics inevitably gets in the way of good design: read more »
Embarrassed by the rejection of a Jets stadium for the West Side and the endless squabbling about the design for a Freedom Tower at ground zero, city and state officials overseeing the Javits project seem to be in a mad rush to push it through. With shadowy political maneuvering, they have stifled the kind of public debate that could have led to a more ambitious vision for the convention center and the decrepit neighborhoods next to it.- Tom McGeveran
On the Waterfront
Don't miss this survey of the battle for the soul of the East River waterfront--both sides of the river, and of the argument--in Gotham Gazette.
A bit of context:
It has happened in many of the great old cities of the world. In London, a power station along the Thames River became the Tate Modern Museum. In Paris, a train station on the Seine became the Musee d’Orsay. In San Francisco, an old chocolate factory became Ghirardelli Square, an essential tourist stop.
Kent Barwick of the Municipal Arts Society probably has the right idea:
"It's not like all other rivers. It's a gritty, workingman's river. That's where the energy is. That's where the action is."
But what does that mean for development? read more »
- Tom McGeveranDefending Le Corbusier
Yesterday, The Real Estate called attention to Christopher Caldwell's criticism of the architecture of Le Corbusier as being responsible for the Paris riots, in The Times magazine.
Today, Clay Risen responds to the blame-Le Corbusier-first crowd on the New Republic's website.
He concludes his defense with the following:
"The idea that architecture alone can cause--and solve--social problems is a mistake. Even Le Corbusier knew that." read more »
-Michael CalderoneMatch Point: Woody Wins! With Witty, Anglophiliac Angst

Match Point: Woody Wins! With Witty, Anglophiliac Angst
My Plea to Paris Hilton: Lose the Exotic Beastie!

Goddess From Poughkeepsie: Ravaged Arc of a Beauty's Life
French Police, Muslims Pull Punches ... for Now
Times in Settlement Talks Over Sachs
Sachs, a former Baghdad bureau chief, and the Guild had been scheduled to challenge her termination at arbitration proceedings beginning today. Those proceedings have been put off in favor of settlement discussions.
Sachs' dismissal was accompanied by accusations she had sent anonymous e-mails and/or letters to the wives of Times reporters Dexter Filkins and John Burns, alerting them to alleged marital infidelity in the war zone.
Denouncing co-workers for philandering may be an uncollegial move, but it's not necessarily a firable offense. In August, the Guild described Sachs' case as "strictly one of credibility. The Times has accused her of doing something she insists she didn't do."
The Guild also said that the Times did not pay Sachs any severance, and that company officials said "she was being dishonest with them when they questioned her about the incident in question, an accusation she denies."
Under the Times' contract with the Guild, a source familiar with the terms explained, any type of dishonesty--lying, stealing, etc.--can be cause for termination.
But when she was dismissed, Sachs publicly disputed the charges and said she had taken a polygraph test and passed. Last month, Sachs traveled to New York from Paris, where she now lives, and took a second polygraph test, which she also passed, according to a source familiar with her case.
The Times is also facing an arbitration session on Nov. 15, that of former Times photographer Nancy Siesel, who was fired in March 2005 for performance reasons. Both Siesel and Sachs are being represented, along with the Guild, by Barry Peek, an labor lawyer with Meyer, Suozzi, English and Klein. Mr. Peek declined to comment on Sachs' case.
In an e-mail from Paris, Sachs wrote that charges brought against her by "some people at the New York Times" were "totally false."
Sachs joined the Times in 1998 from Newsday, where she had been both a Moscow and Middle East correspondent. She became the Times' Baghdad bureau chief in September 2003. After a troubled five-month tenure there--during which press reports had her in a turf war with both Burns and Filkins--she returned to New York, then became the Istanbul bureau chief in March 2004. She remained in that post till her firing.
More recently, she has lived in Paris, freelancing for the Globe and Mail. Her husband, Claude Lorieux, who covered the Middle East for Le Figaro, died in April, and she has been working to complete a book on the Arab world he had been writing. In the spring, she plans to start teaching at the journalism school at Sciences Po in Paris.
It remains unclear what, exactly, happened in the centrifuge that was the Times' Baghdad bureau during Sachs' tumultuous time there.
An acquaintance of Sachs said that some people who know her felt that the missives that led to her downfall may have been a setup by someone who wished her ill. Asked whether that reflected her own feelings on the matter, Sachs said, via e-mail from Paris, "No, it's not."
In another e-mail, Sachs wrote. "I hope you understand that I certainly enjoyed my job at the Times. The Istanbul bureau, where I was last, was my dream job, one I wanted for many years." read more »
--Sheelah Kolhatkar






















