At Graydon Carter's Party, Swells Swill as Stocks Slide

This article was published in the September 22, 2008, edition of The New York Observer.

At Graydon Carter's Party, Swells Swill as Stocks Slide
Patrick McMullan

On Monday, Sept. 15—the day the Dow dropped 504 points—some of the well-heeled guests at a party for Graydon Carter’s Vanity Fair: The Portraits, A Century of Iconic Images seemed a little rattled. “I think it’s great, I think it should happen every day,” said IAC chairman Barry Diller, who recently split his company in five parts. “Yes, I’m joking. Sorry,” he barked as he quickly excused himself. 

Others were more sanguine. “I think it’s a correction. If you take the long-term view of things, the ups and downs don’t seem so dramatic,” said svelte Vanity Fair contributor Amy Fine Collins. “I remember in 1987, there was this big Christian Lacroix party and it was right around the time that the stock market crashed. The world didn’t end, it just went into a different phase.”

“I’m checking Hamptons real estate ads!” joked Mr. Carter, seated at a table signing copies of his hefty photo book. “This is going to happen periodically, and the city levels off and ultimately becomes better.”

Author Fran Lebowitz developed a mischievous smirk when the Transom asked her about the economy. “Are you kiddin’? I can’t wait!” she exclaimed. “Just when you think how horrible New York has become in terms of things interfering with the tone of the city, they’re finally leaving!”

Who is leaving?

“The rich people! They’re leaving! They’re leaving! And all these tourists, they be gone!” Ms. Lebowitz did admit she feels sympathy for lower-level employees who have lost their jobs at the big firms.

Architect Richard Meier, who lately has become known for designing costly Manhattan apartment buildings, seemed somewhat more disturbed by the news. “I don’t know how to deal with it or what it means. Certainly, it’s going to have a serious effect on my work here.”

When asked just how long our economic troubles might last, Mr. Meier said, “Hopefully, two or three more hours.” Then he tilted his head back and took a swig of Champagne.

ialeksander@observer.com

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Jim (not verified) says:

Isn't Ms. Lebowitz one of the rich? I hope she defaults on her toenhouse.

esquared (not verified) says:

The rich people are leaving? Oh noooooooooooooo!

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Fran's right in the middle of all those people who have made New York unbearable.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Damn, what 2 ugly people.. stay in New York City. If Vanity Fair doesn't want tourism in New York City, why don't they take a public stand on it, write an article,, dare you

Frank Schifano (not verified) says:

There's an old saying, "Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it." Well, I agree that the recent influx of the super rich has had, in some ways, a detrimental effect on the common man's life in the city. In other ways, it hasn't all been bad. How many remember how things were in the 70's and early 80's? You were greeted at every stop light by squeegee men, crime was rampant, the streets were filthy (you think they're bad now?), no one wanted to come here, the subways were impossible and dangerous, and the city was broke. No one in their right mind wants to see those conditions again. Face it, New York isn't gong to be a manufacturing town it was when it supported armies of workers and their families again any time soon. Now we have tourism as a much larger part of the overall economy than it ever was in the past. Like it or not, only a fool would want to ignore that fact.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

What a hypocrite Fran Lebowitz is! She is so one of "them." Get a clue lady! And the tourists won't leave! The worse the dollar gets the more tourists from other countries invade the city.

scott3307 (not verified) says:

Every family has problems. You're hopeless.
640-802 / 642-552 / 642-691 / 70-624 / MB2-632

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.