Gag Time

MORE On the Town
Choke
89 minuted
Written and Directed by Clark Gregg
Starring Sam Rockwell, Kelly Macdonald, Anjelica Huston, Brad William Henke, Joel Grey
I don’t know what to tell you about a dismal bucket of nauseating swill called Choke, except to warn that if you spend hard-earned money to sit through it, you deserve to do exactly what the title implies. Based on a novel by Chuck Palahniuk, the loony Oregon-based author of such literary horrors as Fight Club and the nauseating Snuff, Choke sets out with only one mindless purpose—to outrage, alienate and confuse readers and viewers alike. Directed and adapted from an unreadable book by an actor named Clark Gregg, who has been watching entirely too many noxious Charlie Kaufman flicks, it pretends to be about the lost world of sex addicts, but it’s not really about anything except how to make a movie with no lasting value. The fearless (and almost always wasted) actor Sam Rockwell plays a self-loathing sicko in sex-addiction rehab, where he recites the 12 Step program with fellow addicts (among them, would you believe, Joel Grey?) who believe “orgasms release endorphins, and endorphins kill pain.” You know, the kind of people who end up in emergency rooms with light bulbs in their orifices. When he isn’t mounting everyone with a manageable zipper and counting his own orgasms, he divides his time between playing an indentured servant in an 18th-century colonial theme park, where the mere sight of a woman milking a cow sends him into paroxysms of uncontrollable lust, and visiting an insane asylum for oversexed senior citizens (politely called a “constant care facility”), which houses his mother, a nut job named Ida Mancini, woefully played by Anjelica Huston—who seems to have temporarily taken leave of her senses—in wigs that look like Brillo pads. No wonder he’s as mad as an oversexed outhouse gerbil. All of his life, the old crone has forced him to believe he’s been cloned from the sacred foreskin of Jesus Christ, which she stole from the Vatican. Or maybe she kidnapped him from a stroller in front of a bowling alley while she was passing through Iowa. Neither version of his birth origin has any resounding impact, and it takes only a few minutes before you realize you couldn’t care less. Meanwhile, the film jumps back and forth in incoherent time frames between his childhood, when his mother used to break into the zoo at night and let the animals out of their cages, and the present, where his mentally challenged roommate and best friend Denny (Brad William Henke), a serial masturbator, collects rocks and drinks out of slug pans in people’s flower gardens. Mr. Rockwell’s character’s one talent is to elicit sympathy in restaurants by faking elaborate choking displays, which result in throwing up all over people’s dinners. Mr. Rockwell does more vomiting than acting. This is a comedy? No, just another in a long and regrettable line of bottom feeders made by hacks who make it up as they go along. Still nursing nightmares of Hudson Hawk, Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain, and every movie ever written by Charlie Kaufman, I can’t exactly call Choke the worst movie ever made, but you get the picture.
rreed@observer.com



























"I don’t know what to tell you about a dismal bucket of nauseating swill called Choke, except to warn that if you spend hard-earned money to sit through it, you deserve to do exactly what the title implies."
So people deserve to die for paying to see a movie you don't like? Well that certainly sounds reasonable!
Hey, Hudson Hawk was AWESOME.
I totally disagree, I read the book and loved it, true every 3rd chapter or so was so gross I felt like vomiting, but thats a part of the charm of the story. I'm not going to judge you on this one review but I wonder what movies interest you because if your gonna trash this movie and it's not your style, well then your kinda wasting everyone's time. No matter how good it could be to someone else, your review will just shit all over it.
Wow, if you didnt like the book I'd say you have zero taste. Obviously most critics liked it (70 % on rottentomatoes.com) so you are in the minority. Maybe you are the one who should do what the title implies...
If you liked CHOKE you'll want to read HOGG by Samuel Delaney.
The fact that this review starts with the phrase "I don’t know what to tell you about a dismal bucket of nauseating swill called Choke" proves to me that you honestly don't know what to tell me about this movie, and thus resorted to the easiest way out: Relentlessly hurling unnecessarily wordy insults at the film until it goes away. Just because you aren't comfortable with a movie about sex and sexual addiction doesn't mean that the more open minded of us can't enjoy it.
One of the worst reviews I've ever read.
I like this book..
Well, it certainly figures that if you don't like Charlie Kaufman movies you wouldn't like this one. Of course you did give "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," an 85%. I guess maybe if Judd Apatow tried to make this movie you'd dole out your praises generously. Thanks for giving me even more of a reason to see "Choke."
Completely agree. I did spend my hard-earned cash on it, and I certainly FELT like choking throughout the majority of the movie. Great review.
anjelica huston got ugly lookin' fast.
I did not like this movie either but this was the worse review I have ever read, even worse than the film itself.
Choke is a verb. It implies nothing. It is in fact explicit. I believe you meant to say "commands". You get paid to do this, right?