Real Estate

Javits Center Expansion: It May Just Be Renovations

This article was published in the December 3, 2007, edition of The New York Observer.

Javits Center Expansion: It May Just Be Renovations
James Hamilton.

After floating a number of multibillion-dollar plans to expand the Javits Convention Center, the state’s economic development agency is considering a drastically scaled-down version that would renovate the existing building without creating any more exhibit space, according to individuals briefed on the plan.

Patrick Foye, the downstate chairman of the Empire State Development Corporation, is still weeks or months away from a decision on which plan to pursue, according to these individuals, but the so-called repair-the-roof option was presented to trade-show organizers two weeks ago.

The repair option would cost between $700 million and $800 million, according to Ken McAvoy, senior vice president for Reed Exhibitions The Americas, who attended a meeting with other exhibitors and Mr. Foye on Nov. 14. That compares to $3.1 billion that the ESDC estimates that the original expansion plan, approved under the Pataki administration, would now cost, and to $5 billion for a deluxe version that the ESDC also considered. About $1.8 billion is available to fund any alterations.

Merely renovating the giant, five-block-long I.M. Pei structure would please nobody: not the hotel operators who hoped to attract white-collar conventions; nor trade-show organizers, who wanted more space to rent to their exhibitors; nor the labor unions, who were looking forward to the hundreds of construction jobs that the expansion would necessitate.

But the repair option may be the only one that the state and the city can afford.

“Part of the problem is that given the horrendous economics, I think that everybody agrees that there is not enough money to do anything but patch the roof,” said State Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, a Westchester Democrat who chairs the Assembly’s committee on authorities and corporations. “I think the problem is that what we are looking at would cost two or three times the available money for a mediocre facility.”

Mr. Brodsky, who blamed the situation on the Pataki administration, said that he had not taken a position on which option to pursue. He has scheduled a hearing for Dec. 14, at which Mr. Foye is expected to testify.

ESDC spokesman A.J. Carter would not comment except to say, “ESDC is assessing, in detail, a range of Javits Center options as we address the needs and desires of the various stakeholders and our mandate to spend tax dollars prudently.”

The expansion of the convention center, located along 11th Avenue between 34th and 39th streets, has been years in the making. Last year, the ESDC approved a $1.7 billion plan, using state and city contributions, a $1.50-a-room hotel surcharge and expected proceeds from selling off a Javits-owned block to the south, between 33rd and 34th streets.

But when Governor Eliot Spitzer took office, his appointee, Mr. Foye, undertook a top-to-bottom review of the project, and determined that previous cost estimates were unrealistically low. The Pataki plan, after inflation and engineering details were accounted for, came in around $3 billion. At the same time, exhibitors were complaining that the extra exhibit space proposed—about 300,000 new square feet on top of the approximately 750,000 square feet now there—was too meager to justify the cost, which prompted the project’s architects, Richard Rogers, FxFowle, and A. Epstein and Sons, to come up with a scheme that would add even more.

The shift toward diminished expectations apparently came after a September meeting with hotel operators, when Mr. Foye trotted out three versions ranging in price from $3.1 billion to $5 billion. Individuals briefed on the meeting said that the hoteliers were unwilling to contemplate a higher surcharge on hotel rooms.

Kathryn Wylde, the president of the Partnership for New York City, said that the broader business community would likely accept a more modest version of the expansion than originally heralded under the Pataki administration.

“For a decade, the business community was convinced that the most important thing you could do was to build a convention center in terms of generating economic development,” she said. “But that decade was the 1990’s. I think that perspective has changed as a lot of the city’s other economic drivers have flourished. Certainly, at this point, having a decent, attractive, usable convention center is more compelling than trying to figure out how to find $4 billion or $5 billion to build a state-of-the-art facility.”

Joseph Spinnato, president of the New York City Hotel Association, said in an e-mail, “We will not be making any comments re: the expansion of the Javits Center while talks are continuing between the Hotel Association, the city and the state.” Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

dgutman says:

Not a bad summary, but you got the Patatki sequence wrong. The Pataki-approved plan (in July, 2006) was the larger version. It would have added 520,000 sq. ft. of rentable space, at an estimated cost of $1.7 billion. By December the cost of the Pataki plan had ballooned, so the plan was shrunk to 313,000 sq. ft. of rentable space. (See "Javits: Now Smaller and Pricier Than Ever!" http://www.nyobserver.com/node/35945)

Pat Foye's new cost estimates found that the original plan (or its equivalent) would cost $5 billion, while the reduced plan would cost $3.1 billion. The constricted site is a major problem because it allows only a vertical expansion, which is much more costly.

It is possible to build an expansion that meets the exhibitors' space requirements (over 600,000 sq. ft. rentable space) at less cost than the reduced plan, but only if the expansion is built horizontally over the MTA's Western Rail Yard, an option that the City and State have yet to seriously consider.

Tony (not verified) says:

I believe the unfortunate state of affairs concerning the major Manhattan construction projects is multi-factorial as most issues are in The Big Apple! "Politics as usual", from former Governor Pataki's delusions of granduer, though in his defense, I don't believe his administration was adequately apprised of the true extent of renovation required at the existing structure. Part of the daily operations shouldn't be consistently watching the weather forecast in order to react and tarp the facility's roof for every and any show that comes to town.

Secondly, in my oponion there are too many governing commitees involved, between the ESDC ... The PACB ... Community Board 4 ... Mr. Silver and the Assembly ... Mr. Bruno and the Senate ... Mr. Brodsky ... Mr. Gargano ... Mr. Spinnato .. and so on and so on.

And without doubt the former self proclaimed ethical "Steamroller" of a Governor that shamed and embarrassed himself, his family, and his state, didn't help matters when he basically refused to work together in any way with the senate or assembly, falsey accused Senator Bruno of wrongdoing, of course via an unethical auditing process we've all come to know as "Troopergate", and then the UNTHINKABLE, but that aside the man already had his own reconstrued plans for Javits expansion from go!

The unfortunate reality we face now is the dismal state of our economy compounded by an economic forecast that doesn't make one choose to put away the umbrella!

As far as the Javits Center is concerned, I believe both properties north and south of the facility should be sold to finance the desperately required structural renovations and systems upgrades.

The center is booked to the hilt and making money; let's maintain the structure and continue to imoprove relations with various shows, labor, and the community.

The number 7 line project is one that will eventually be imperative to the growth of businesses and housing at the blocks sold North and south of the Center, and it also strengthens the case for restoring portions of the high line, and making the west side a place people from all over decide to catch the number 7 to see shows, high line gardens/decks, and even the intrepid when she comes home.

The Hudson river is one of our most valued and beautiful resources in New York; There has to be some symbiotic resolution for modest economic growth and continued restoration of the west side.

I agree that a hotel at present shouldn't even be on the table considering the the cost of it's existense doesn't make this writer believe that it would make a significant difference in attracting crowds. I fear the existence of it and the necessary price of rooms would only produce yet another venue for the elite to entertain whomever!

-a realist though optomist!

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.